Updates from November, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ushaft 2:11 am on November 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    कविता: एक हुल गोहीहरु (लेखक – केदार वाशिष्ठ) 


    एक हुल गोहीहरु

    -केदार वाशिष्ठ

    नदी किनाराका झुपडीका पीँढीहरुमा
    पुसमाघको घाममा लम्पसार परेर
    तल बग्दै गरेका
    नारायणी¸ गण्डकी र असङ्ख्य
    नदीनालाका छाल
    अनि शान्त तालतलैयामा
    सापटी लिएर
    गिद्धका आँखा
    अनि तिनमा आफ्नै आँसु भरेर

    हिजोआज
    एक हुल गोहीहरु
    सहर पसेका छन् ।

    फेरिएको छ जीवनशैली
    चाहिन्न पानी
    प्राण धान्नका लागि
    स्कच ह्विस्की बियर र वाइनका
    बन्द बोतल भए पुग्छ
    ठ्वाङ्ङ आवाजसहित
    तिनलाई खोलेर
    घटघटघट
    काँचका गिलासमा
    बरफका टुक्राको पहाड पगाल्दै
    चियर्स गर्छन्

    हिजोआज
    एक हुल गोहीहरु
    सहर पसेका छन् ।

    हुँदैन तिनलाई मिठो
    कुनै जलचरहरु
    बरु चाखेका छन् तिनले
    एउटा नयाँ जीवको स्वाद
    पूर्वतिर अलि तल
    अनि पश्चिममा माथितिर ढल्केर
    विश्वमानचित्रमा
    सबैभन्दा उचा नाक भएको
    लाम्चो आकृतिको
    कुल्चेर ढाड त्यसैको

    हिजोआज
    एक हुल गोहीहरु
    सहर पसेका छन् ।

    हो असङ्ख्य सन्तती छन् तिनका
    झण्डै तीन कोटी
    तिनैलाई सितन बनाएर
    सगर छुने नाको लाम्चे जीवको
    ढाडमा टेकेर
    भाग लगाउँदैछन्
    फलमासु¸ हाडखोड¸ अनि बिलोको
    तप्प तप्प चुहिएको आलो रगत
    आँसुले पखाल्ने गरी

    हिजोआज
    एक हुल गोहीहरु
    सहर पसेका छन् ।


    साभार: Literature of Nepali


    तपाईँलाई यी कविताहरु पनि मन पर्न सक्छन्:


     
  • ushaft 12:40 am on November 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: confronting the truth, documentary, transitional justice, Truth and Reconciliation   

    Confronting the Truth: Nepali version of the documentary on transitional justice is now on YouTube 


    Please watch and spread the word
    यो वृत्तचित्र पुरै नेपाली भाषामा छ। नेपाली दर्शकहरुले यो वृत्तचित्र हेरेर लाभ उठाउन भनेर नै यसलाई इन्टरनेटमा उपलब्ध बनाउने प्रयास गरिएको हो। जति धेरै मानिसले यो हेर्छन्, उति नै राम्रो। कृपया अरुलाई पनि यसको बारे जानकारी दिनुहोला र आफ्ना साथीहरुलाई हेर्न लगाउनुहोला। भिडियोहरु यो पोष्टको अन्त्यमा छन्।

    This documentary was uploaded to Youtube for the benefit of Nepalese viewers. The more people watch it, the better. Please share this post and encourage your friends to watch it. The videos are at the end of this post.

    The Nepali version of the documentary “Confronting the Truth” is now available on the web. Many thanks to York Zimmerman Inc. and A Force More Powerful Films for this generous move. I very much appreciate their response to my request to make this movie available online. The filmmakers’ understanding of the situation in Nepal and their willingness to keep aside their commercial interests for the sake of the greater good of our society is really worthy of high praise. (More on this in the Endnote).

    The DVD of this documentary can be bought online- in fact I encourage you to do so if you like it.

    Confronting the Trugh: Truth Commissions and Societies in Transition (73 minutes) (2007)

    Confronting the Trugh: Truth Commissions and Societies in Transition (73 minutes) (2007)

    Featuring: Desmond Tutu, Jose Ramos-Horta
    Director: Steve York
    Rated: Unrated
    Studio: York Zimmerman Inc.
    DVD Release Date: July 15, 2007
    Run Time: 73 minutes

    Confronting the Truth shows how countries, which have experienced massive human rights violations, have created official, independent bodies known as truth commissions.


    Since 1983, truth commissions have been established in over 20 countries, in all parts of the world. Confronting the Truth documents the work of truth commissions in South Africa, Peru, East Timor, and Morocco. Taking testimony from victims and perpetrators, and conducting detailed investigations, truth commissions create a historical record of abuses that have often remained secret. They identify patterns of abuse, and the structural and institutional weaknesses, and societal and cultural problems, and weak legal systems that made the violation possible. To remedy these faults, they recommend governmental, societal and legal reforms to address the pain of the past, to safeguard human rights and due process, and to ensure that the horror will not be repeated.

    (More …)

     
    • downtoearth 7:10 am on November 21, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I am afraid we are never going to have a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Nepal. The interests of both the former rebels and the army intersect in trying to withhold or altogether stop the commission from forming. It’s a case of ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ and the noticeable silence of the former royalists on the proposed amnesty of Balkrishna Dhungel only strengthens this claim. They are equally red in the hands when it comes to war crimes and cases of human right violations and are afraid that a truth and reconciliation commission would put them under scanner. It is sad that the perpetrators of war crimes on both sides, far from owning up to their mistakes and making amends, are not even willing to accept them. People say that instead of complicating the issue and endangering the government once again, it would be better if Dhungel is pardoned. What they forget is, he hasn’t even accepted the charge to be considered for forgiveness by the family or the president in the first place.

      Thanks for your initiative to make the documentary public. Hopefully it will embolden that ‘never again’ sentiment in people who watch it. Nepal has many lessons to learn from the experiences of the countries featured. Also many thanks to the makers of the documentary for their willingness to share it with Nepali people.

  • ushaft 12:14 am on November 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: adhocism, Anuradha Koirala, avenues, child trafficking, journalism, , Lila Mani Poudel, media analysis, mysansar, nagarik, nayapatrika, nepalnews, , press release, republica, salokya, umesh shrestha   

    Adhocism and the culture of press-release journalism – I 


    Let me start with some examples.

    1. Kantipur as a tool of Maoist propaganda: “Prachanda shortlisted in the 100 eminent personalities of the world chosen by China”

      Kantipur: Prachanda among the 100 towering personalities chosen by China

      Kantipur functioning as a tool of Maoist propaganda: "Prachanda among the 100 towering personalities chosen by China"

      On 16th march 2010, the official mouthpiece publication of Nepal’s Maoist party wrote (Krishna Sen Online): “UCPN-Maoist Chairman Com. Prachanda has been selected among the 100 towering personalities from the different sectors of the world to take part in the Shanghai Expo that is going to be held after two months in Shanghai, China. During the period, continuing for 6 months, Prachanda will take part in a special interaction programme there. In the Expo, science and technology, industrial production and economic development will be exhibited.”

      In reality, the organizers of the World Expo Shanghai had approached many celebrities for it’s campaign named “100 celebrities talking about the World Expo Shanghai.” The official notice of the organizers from 2009 says that they had received manuscripts from 90 such celebrities and expected the number to exceed 100. No other credible news source talked of it as China’s recognition of the personalities as “the 100 most eminent in in the world.” It was just a publicity campaign and an attempt by the fest organizers to gather wider recognition..

      It was a time when Maoist Chairman Prachanda was trying desperate measures to get back to power. To increase his bargaining power with others (including India), he was trying to portray that China was giving him importance. Such a publicity gimmick was given front-page coverage by Kantipur just a day after it was published in the Maoist mouthpiece (see picture). Another daily paper Naya Patrika went as far as to say that Prachanda was selected as one of the 8 world leaders.

      The reader comments in the above pieces show how these papers succeeded in garnering support and sympathy for Prachanda. A few months later, Kantipur ran a report from the Expo. It read: “although it was advertised that Chairman Prachanda would address the Expo, he did not participate in any such event. The Nepalese Embassy in China said they had no knowledge of his participation as a special speaker in the event.”

      If they were mistakes, I am not aware of the paper which calls itself the country’s largest selling daily apologizing for them, leading me to believe that it was deliberate. I have also written of some other examples of Kantipur operating as a PR agency for the Maoist party.

      (More …)

     
    • Ekendra 2:19 am on November 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Awesome!
      Thank you for clearly figuring out details. Waiting for other parts of the article!
      But I don’t think Nepalese media will ever change – as the points you have listed will continue to be in.

    • Ujjwal Acharya 4:26 am on November 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Interesting observations. I agree with a lot of the things you have pointed out. Responsibility of the content is a far-fetched idea for many public communicators (journalists, bloggers included) and this is not helping any cause.

      Most of the pieces in journalism are based on ‘what someone said’ rather than ‘what we found true or verifiable among what they said’. This is a trend that is not going to improve until their is public scrutiny on their content (and post such as this is a part of public scrutiny). Thank you for that.

      Follow-up of the issues media has raised is another problem with journalism in Nepal. Media seem to raise the issue, and forget about it – neither claim success nor regret errors. Maharagate is one of such example.

      And, little explanation on the news of ‘children rescue’ that Republica published. As a friend, I raised the issue with the social affairs editor and he said due to the sensitivity of the issue, they tried their best to balance it and gave more priorities to what the children themselves said to the reporter. I do understand your viewpoint on the earlier blog on asking wrong questions. But the ‘rescue’ is still a controversial issue (take note that the children and/or someone with them organized a press conference with them a few days ago and said that same thing, I don’t know if any newspaper published that but I read the news report on National News Agency).

      • ushaft 7:03 am on November 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        My intention is not to be harsh or rude- there should be healthy criticism so that things can be reviewed and improved. Thanks for appreciating this.

        About the ‘children rescue’ story: I have written above about the press conference too- maybe you didnt notice :)

    • Rubeena 6:55 am on November 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      None of these problems are going to go unless there is a paradigm shift in journalism, in fact a shift in our entire society where the problem of what you point out as adhocism is rooted. It is amazing how our society is so comfortable with mediocrity and dreads perfection. Much of it may be due to plain laziness, the unwillingness to make the effort, see beyond the obvious, challenge established norms. Because all of these take work whereas shoving press releases as news in front of gullible and unquestioning readers don’t. Thanks for taking the time to write this. To Ujjwal ji, many thanks for taking forward the issue of rescued children to the concerned editors. Once more here, I would like to point out that the issue is not of ‘fake rescue’ but of ‘fake orpahns’. It is as simple as that. If journalists in UK and India could see that, if my paper could see that, if Ushaft could see that, I don’t understand why Republica could not. It is either deliberate or as Ushaft says adhocism and carelessness, and I would like to add, insult to the intellect of the readers as well. One of the two. But yes I do believe that the reporter concerned did not do it deliberately and had good intentions.

      What need do we have for journalists if a crowd’s testimony can pass off as news in the papers? There’s got to be checking, rechecking and cross-checking. Pity that we the journalists are failing to do it. I don’t see any point of journalists deriding citizen bloggers anymore because turns out they are even more compromised, not to mention lacking passion which leads them to be so laid-back and careless about their work.

    • Henry Scobie 11:21 pm on November 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      The Americans are writing about the fake orphans as well.

      Are They Orphans?

      The American Prospect:

      http://prospect.org/article/are-they-orphans

      “One version of the orphanage scam has just been uncovered in India by the Esther Benjamins Memorial Foundation. Several years ago, a now-infamous child-trafficker traveled through Nepal’s Humla province, asking families to pay him to take their children to boarding schools in Kathmandu.”

    • Henry Scobie 4:34 pm on December 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Dal Bahadur Phadera & the suppressed UNICEF report:

      http://pearadoptinfo-nepal.blogspot.com/2011/11/dal-bahadur-phadera-suppressed-unicef.html

      UNICEF Nepal’s suppressed Humla report is now available on the web.

      The reason UNICEF Nepal suppressed (i.e., never published) their 2005 report is unclear.

      Nor is it clear why trafficked Nepali children were left at the Michael Job Centre, Tamil Nadu, for over six years.

  • ushaft 2:38 pm on November 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Egypt, hosni mubarak, Libya, Muammar Gaddafi, , new and old, Syria   

    The new and the old 


    Be careful when you hear of the new vs old distinction.

    Nepal: 2006

    Nepal: 2006 (picture: thefirecollective.org)

    The mass demonstrations in Egypt earlier this year now famous by the name of “the Arab Spring” overthrew Hosni Mubarak and apparently heralded Egypt into a “new age” of democracy, freedom and prosperity. While the revolution was being tweeted, I was not sure whether to feel happy or sad for the Egyptians as they were going through what we in Nepal have already been through. We were told that the “old” was ugly, bad and evil and had to be uprooted at any cost and replaced with the “new”- a dream that was not only successfully sold, but also nicely executed. This dream was so dear and hypnotic, it led to a decade long bloody war and even years after its formal end, continues to have many ardent supporters.

    Egypt

    During the previous years, Egypt had maintained its identity as a fast progressing economy in the middle of a very difficult region. Although the whole region was plagued by religious extremism, Egypt’s secular regime still provided educated women the opportunity to wear the dresses they liked. Like all countries following the 80-90s path of economic liberalization and capitalism, inequality was on the rise in Egypt, but it’s economy was growing substantially. Egypt had good relations with Europe and America and the collaboration provided great opportunities for Egyptians in science, research, education and trade. Outside their country, the Egyptians also enjoyed the positive image of their country- contrast that with the kind of treatment the people of many other countries in the Arab region receive.

    (More …)

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,511 other followers

%d bloggers like this: