Who is Saurav? (and Maila Baje)


I’m intrigued by two interesting and mysterious characters of the Nepali intellectual sphere. Though he still writes informative blog-posts, Maila Baje has chosen to keep himself secret for too long to be interesting anymore. Someday he’ll stop writing and someone will die at around the same time- and maybe we’ll know who he is. There has been some guesswork about his identity on Nepal-related blogs like here and here. Because the former army chief is known to have used a pseudonym (Ajay P Nath) to write in The Rising Nepal and elsewhere before, my wild guess is that Maila Baje is Rookmangud Katawal.

The other character, who is not as mysterious as Maila Baje regarding his identity is a columnist called Saurav. He writes with just this name (no last name) in the Kantipur daily. I noticed him first sometime in 2009 or 2010. Though I was bored by the first piece I read, I wondered who this well-learned person was. Since then I’ve read only a few pieces written by him, highly impressed by some, uninterested by others. Someone I knew happened to know his identity and, and I was impressed of what I heard from him. Today I read something interesting by him after long, a piece debating the origins of Nepal’s so-called indigenous races and the Khas people.

I can’t say anything about the issue raised in his latest article for I don’t know much about the subject, but I thoroughly enjoyed his argumentation and the wide variety of evidences he presents from a wider range of sources. I hear that he has been involved in a op-ed cross fire with some people with opposing viewpoints. Whatever the case, the last paragraph of his latest writeup sums it up. He says that debating the origin of Khas people is just an “interesting exercise” and more important is that people who spit upon Khas people are unknowingly spitting upwards and into their own faces. The definition of “indigenous race” is unclear and the definition prescribed by EU, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Vatican and Protestants in order to spread their religion is not acceptable to a Nepali. People who do communal politics and are demanding their own piece of this country that they never built should be able define these terms first.

I liked this line of argument because the history of Nepal and its peoples is very ancient and there has not been a single, authoritative version. Many races, including the Khas have a very long history dating to prehistoric times, but parts of history are unclear, mingled up or no reliable evidence is available to anyone so far. In such a situation, drawing up conclusions based on less than half baked ideas is only stupid and fatal in the long run. The Europeans had also proposed the Aryan Invasion theory for almost all of our history to show superiority of their race over the South Asian civilization. Today new and previously unknown evidences and study-results are showing that all that was a big lie, and South Asian civilizations were ancient and more advanced than anyone could ever imagine [See this video series for a brief introduction to the subject.]. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

His name is Dinesh Satyal. Here’s some information I have compiled about this guy. I think the country needs his knowledge to re-define parts of its history and identity. Respect to all the information and knowledge he has collected- I urge him to use it for the greater good of our society.


  • CK Lal mentions Saurav in one of his writings: “Only a columnist of Saurabh’s stature could have been so blunt.”
  • Saurav used to write fiction, and was awarded the German Deutsche Welle Literature Prize in 1987
  • There is an interesting discussion from 1999 involving names like Rabindra Mishra and Ashutosh Tiwari discussing the strengths of Saurav’s columns during his Deshantar days.
  • He was associated with the BBC Nepali service.
  • He did an exclusive interview of King Gyanendra in 2001.
  • A brief description of a party thrown by the person to question, and attended by one Cocktail Man.

Interview With Saurav

Bookworm Babbles by Avash Karmacharya

Born in 1958 at Putali Sadak in Kathmandu, Dinesh Satyal, more popularly known as Saurav, graduated in Journalism and Public Administration and earned his post-graduation degree in Political Science from Tribhuvan University.

He started his career as a sub-editor at the Gorkhapatra daily and later joined the BBC Nepali Service as a senior programme producer. Later, he moved to Kantipur daily as an executive editor and became the chief-editor of the Naya Sadak daily. Satyal works as a freelancer for many dailies and weeklies at present.

What books are you currently reading, or have finished reading?
I recently went through Khas Jatiko Itihas by Bal Krishna Pokhrel. It’s a fantastic volume completely based on etymology. It’s probably the most intellectual challenge offered ever by a Nepali to the most brilliant historians and anthropologists not only of Nepal but the world.

Genre/s that you prefer to read…
I prefer reading books on plant aesthetics. I like reading all sorts of genres. However, I avoid physics, theology, psychology, sports, Tantra, and philosophy.

The story behind how you picked up reading habit …
I’m not very outgoing and don’t make many friends. I always regarded my father as my best friend. Unfortunately, I lost him when I was very young. Then I substituted books for my father, best friend, counselor, secretary, guru, guide and role model.

Interesting reading habits you have…
I read for self-satisfaction. In other words, I read not to show off to others but to pass the time. Reading is like meditating for me. I read one book for once but remember it forever.

Writers who have inspired you a lot are…
Frankly speaking, not one writer has ever inspired me to this day.

How important is reading, irrespective of choices and profession?
I don’t want to say you must read because reading for the sake of reading and to know yourself better are two different things. Don’t read if you don’t want to. But read to become a better human being.

Tell us about the books that have been your source of inspiration and have touched you deeply…
I can’t say if any books ever inspired me. Still, Devkota’s Muna Madan, Hemingway’s Farewell to Arms, Rajneesh’s preface to his Sambhog Se Samaadhiki Wor have left a great impression on me.

How has reading enhanced your professional commitments?
To a large extent. Reading turned me from a reporter to a columnist in 1989.

One such book that people should not miss to read is…
Actually, I don’t prefer suggesting people to read a particular book because it’s not certain that the book I like should be admired by all. Still, if you insist, let me take the names of more than one – Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire, Lenin’s State and Revolution, Govind Tandon’s Saibaba Sanga Sakshyatkar, and Ghataraj Bhattarai’s Devkotaka Ani Bani.

There’s cinema, television, the Internet and many other forms of entertainment. Don’t you think books have been overshadowed?
Come on, it’s high time to change this question. There’s no substitute for reading and there’s no replacement to books.

When you write, you write about…
I like writing on political issues.

Lavish shopping, attending parties, or sitting in a quiet place and reading books… What would you want to advise young aspiring readers?
Frankly speaking, I’ve never been to places like Bhat Bhateni Supermarket and Bluebird Mall. I gave up attending party in 1987. Amazingly, I’m still not bored of books.

Your favourite saying on reading…
There are three types of readers: 1. He who reads for enjoyment. 2. The one who reads to shout aloud, “I have a reading habit.” 3. He who reads because others are reading. Ask yourself which category you belong to. Please don’t be a pretender.

9 thoughts on “Who is Saurav? (and Maila Baje)

  1. Thanks for the post on Saurav. As an admirer and an avid reader of his articles, I really enjoyed knowing more about the author. His works should go out to the larger public and the author himself must add more credibility to his many reasonable claims by some more rigorous research. I would like to believe many of his claims, mostly because they seem to stem from good intentions and love for this country and its people and because they strive to reinforce the idea of an integrative Nepali society. But arguments are better than intentions any day and I would like to believe Saurav on that basis more. There is no reason why only the works of proper academics should be taken authoritatively. Saurav seems to have enough knowledge to go out and indulge on some first hand research (does not necessarily mean field based), publish (in a journal or if in newspapers then at least in a way that mimics a research article with proper and adequate references) and back up his claims better. His arguments are already extensive coming from different fields of knowledge from botany to etymology. A little work can put him at par with any leading anthropologist provided he follows the research ethic of finding out first and concluding second.

  2. 🙂 Thanx a lot…..I was dumbfounded by his article on ‘Khas’…..I love ‘logical explanations’ of any kind….tho I searched for him on net but found nothing valuable….Thanx again ….And I totally agree with “@downtoearth”…he should write more on issues ‘lesser known’

  3. Thanks @downtoearth and @Nepaleeidiot : yes, the points of the article were shocking in many regards but I think that’s how a true thinker should be like. He should be able to shake your beliefs over and over till people unlearn all their learned biases and can think over clearly again. I wish he does something in this regard, something like @downtoearth has suggested.

  4. As far as his latest article on Kantipur is concerned, he offers some valid points regarding Scandinavian aid behavior in Nepal in relation to secularism. This however is not his first article on the issue. I talked to a PhD at University of Oslo for more clarification; I was then convinced of the parochial nature of aid. Later I managed to go through some research papers by Swedish and Danish graduates on similar issue which evidently put me in Shourav’s camp. Shourav is the only person in Nepal I have found who bears immense knowledge on the subject. Unfortunately, there are very few who understand him or think he is right. Myth and misinformation has overruled the facts, not only in Nepal, but in the world academia itself.

  5. @Rebuttal, Would be nice if you could share your readings with us. I am interested to expand my understanding of the subject. Also I’d be interested to know relevant portions of your observations, studies or conversations🙂

  6. Saurav is amazing .. His basket of knowledge is beyond most so called intellectuals who does not even have 10% of Saurav’s .. Thanks for some information you provided. looking forward ..

  7. The last two links – Gyanendra interview and whatever is the last one – are not woking. Could you please repost the links ? And thanks for the thread.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s